I think there is a distinction between writers who can't be bothered with how their couple got together or developed into the people they are now portrayed as being, and those who have a clear idea but, because they are primarily writing for a community of readers already familiar with a whole range of interpretations and scenarios, don't bother to rehash what has been done repeatedly before, but instead indicate - clearly to those in the community, much less so to those without - what their approach for this story was, and then turn to other matters (cf. wave theory of slash). I don't think the latter is any evidence of bad writing: yes, you limit your audience, but on the other hand the audience you do have is in a better position to appreciate exactly what you're trying to do.
Of course, if what what you are interested in reading is specifically accounts of how a couple got together, rather than what happened afterwards with the first stages left as an exercise for the reader, shipper fic is frequently going to be unsatisfactory, even when good. I guess maybe the earliest stories in any given pairing are more likely to be to your taste?
no subject
Of course, if what what you are interested in reading is specifically accounts of how a couple got together, rather than what happened afterwards with the first stages left as an exercise for the reader, shipper fic is frequently going to be unsatisfactory, even when good. I guess maybe the earliest stories in any given pairing are more likely to be to your taste?