I just went and looked at that review of your panel.

I think ze and I had two very different experiences of what happened there which troubles me. I'm not certain how to parse that difference. Do you think that maybe it's because I know you well, your agenda (or at least framework of understanding of the topic) was clearer to me than someone listening to the panel? Also, I didn't think of your list of talking points as questions you had personally vetted in terms of appropriateness, but questions that occur in discussions of queerness from a variety of perspectives.