Reading Wednesday

[lunabee34]

Charles Portis: Collected Works (LOA #369): Norwood / True Grit / The Dog of the South / Masters of Atlantis / Gringos / Stories & Other Writings by Charles Portis

My rating: 5 of 5 stars


This was a gift, and I expected that I wouldn't enjoy it very much. I don't have much patience for a lot of twentieth-century, white, male, American authors; I'm deeply disinterested in the kind of masculinity Hemingway is peddling, for example. As a Southerner, I'm also really weary of nostalgia/apologia for a South I don't miss at all, and I expected Portis to deliver on both those scores.

I'm happy to say that I was very wrong. I thoroughly enjoyed this collection, and Portis has become one of my favorite novelists. Contrary to my expectations, one of Portis's main projects over his body of work is to subvert stereotypical ideas of masculinity in really surprising ways. For example, in Norwood, the protagonist is this sweetly goofy guy who bumbles cluelessly through life being kind and generous to everyone around him and being taken in by con men but who manages to come out all right in the end. In True Grit, the character with true grit is a 14 year old girl, and the two men in the book are a drunken sad sack and a braggart. Dog of the South features a protagonist who makes confident pronouncements that are stupidly, obviously wrong and who gets hung up on irrelevant minutiae but who is confidently assured of his intellectual superiority.

Portis is also incredibly funny, just laugh-out-loud funny. Masters of Atlantis is a satire about a guy who inadvertently starts a cult. The whole thing is a con, but he's a total believer. It's very funny, but also very prescient commentary about the way conspiracy theories work.

I think my favorite is Gringos. This novel is the most realistic of the bunch and the darkest. It's still funny, but not in a satirical or absurdist way like the others (well, True Grit is not very funny). I don't want to spoil the plot, but I will say it involves debunking ancient astronaut theorists.



View all my reviews

Between Two Fires by Christopher Buehlman

My rating: 4 of 5 stars


This is violent and gory, which I don't mind but may not be everyone's cup of tea. No one is raped on page, but rape is a constant threat, which gets a bit tedious after awhile. I also get weary of the focus on lust and sexual perversion (while understanding that it makes sense for the plot and themes of the book).

Those caveats aside, this was a quick and entertaining read for me. I especially enjoyed the ending--and I do mean the very, very end, like the last handful of paragraphs--which are a lovely moment of grace in a novel that does not contain many moments I would call lovely given that it is set during an epidemic of the Black Death.



View all my reviews

Revelator by Daryl Gregory

My rating: 5 of 5 stars


I really, really like this book.

Explaining why without spoiling plot details of the novel is impossible. What I can say is that the sense of place is incredible, the characters are deftly drawn (even those who only briefly appear), and the story blends genres in really interesting and unexpected ways. This is a novel about family and religion and belonging and choices, and it tells the story of those things with the old, familiar songs but also a fresh melody that made this a page turner for me.



View all my reviews

Bid the Vassal Soar: Interpretive Essays on the Life and Poetry of Phillis Wheatley by Merle A. Richmond

My rating: 1 of 5 stars


I get why Richmond pairs Wheatley and Horton; she's the first African American female poet and he the first African American male poet published in the US and they were once published together in a single collection.

But OMG, this is the most obnoxious book of criticism I've read in a good long while, and it brings absolutely nothing of value to our understanding of Wheatley.

In Richmond's estimation, Wheatley has no genuine selfhood as opposed to Horton's genuine, black selfhood; Wheatley's experiences aren't authentic, black experiences as opposed to Horton's genuine, black experiences; Wheatley's poetry is no good as opposed to Horton's; and Wheatley's education and accomplishments are somehow meaningless compared to Horton's because they were facilitated by her white enslavers rather than being self-taught. Richmond writes about Wheatley as if she has zero interiority at all. It's really, really gross.



View all my reviews

Folle-Farine by Ouida

My rating: 5 of 5 stars


This book is so kinky, and I wish we could go back in time and ask Ouida to what degree the novel is a deliberate, conscious exploration of kinkiness and what exactly she's intending to argue with that exploration if so.

I reread this in preparation for my presentation on Ouida's treatment of birds in her nonfiction essays because it's probably the novel in which the protagonist is most closely identified with birds and the novel which has the most protracted scenes that deal with birds (just in case someone asked me to elaborate on the way in which her arguments manifest in the fiction).

Additional themes include: principles and aesthetics of Romanticism, sadomasochism, the eroticism of self-sacrifice and self-abnegation, silence (both self- and externally-imposed), scathing critiques of Christianity (with some very startling passages in which the female protagonist allies herself with the devil), commentary on art and the role of the artist, sexuality and asexuality, morality.

This is an astonishing and interesting book and nothing at all like what anyone imagines when they hear the phrase Victorian novel.



View all my reviews

Comments

[princessofgeeks]

I enjoy your reviews so much! Thank you.

I haven't read True Grit for years but I remember it as being amazing, and of course it's set in my state so I was very interested in it.

My mom is the world's biggest John Wayne fan, so of course I've seen the movie he made of the book many times, but I was also surprised at how good the new remake of it was. Don't know if you've seen the movies but the new one was actually filmed here, which was nice.

[lunabee34]

I haven't seen any of the movies. I avoided them because I usually dislike Westerns. Now that I've read the book, I am definitely more inclined to watch them!

[princessofgeeks]

They are both good in very different ways and do not have the plot of a typical Western, as you know. The newer one follows the book more closely and gives a bit more prominence to the girl. I was very pleasantly surprised by how good the second one was. Usually I take a dim view of remakes, and the first movie was so huge (I mean, John Wayne!), but it was more like different productions of a beloved play!

Anyway. I know your TBR/V pile is huge but there you are. Because of you I am going to find a Ouida book to read! I had never heard of her before I met you. And now that I am retired I have time for ALL THE READING.

[lunabee34]

All of Ouida's novels are in the public domain and you can find them online to read. It really depends on what you are looking for in terms of what you choose.

Her novels of the 60s are novels of high society that are set in the aristocracy, contain lots of triangulation of desire (two men are really in love with each other and end up marrying each other's sisters as stand-ins for each other), and lots of trapped in marriages to unsuitable women they can't get away from. Strathmore and Held in Bondage are good examples.

Under Two Flags has some of those features but also contains the backdrop of war and lots of soldierly derring do; it continued to be popular into the 20th century and was made into two films.

Puck is a scream, really funny. It's narrated by a dog and contains a lot of Ouida's animal activist commentary. It also contains one of her adventuresses who comes from the lower classes to take the upper classes by storm.

Moths is probably her most popular novel. It contains humor, but it's more serious than the aforementioned, and it's major theme is a woman trapped in a marriage she cannot escape.

My favorites are Princess Napraxine and Othmar, its sequel. Princess Napraxine is such a fascinating character. She's like an amateur scientist, dissecting everyone's emotions and incapable of feeling any of her own until maybe she does feel some possibly. LOL

[corvidology]

I'm a big fan of the Coen Brothers - they take risks so sometimes they fall on their face admittedly - but the John Wayne version is where my money is.

Here, have a trailer:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruTdCaAWTNA

It was such a success, they made a second film. Rooster Cogburn, which is very silly EXCEPT his co-star is Katharine Hepburn and watching the two of them, erm, their characters spar is worth the price of admission! Hepburn and Wayne's politics could not have been more diametrically opposed and it adds to the tension.

I feel I must mention that the view of Native Americans is dodgy at best but I'm guessing you already know that.

[lunabee34]

Ooooh, thank you! <3 <3

[kore]

Oh yeah, True Grit is great! My dad showed me the movie and then gave me the book. It was one of the few Westerns he liked. I haven't read anything else by the author, tho.

[lunabee34]

You should! As good as True Grit is, I actually like several of the other novels better.

[minoanmiss]

thank you for the warning about that terrible book about Wheatl

[lunabee34]

You're welcome. It is to be avoided.

[tabaqui]

Neat! The 'Collected Works' sounds good - I've always liked 'True Grit' (and the modern, non John Wayne movie) -I'll have to see if my library has that.

Between Two Fires sounds interesting, too, but I have little patience with god-stuff, so i dunno....
Thanks for the recs!

[lunabee34]

I loved True Grit, but I actually like a couple of the other novels even better. You should totally check out more of Portis.

I think you should avoid Between Two Fires. The god stuff is kinda the whole point. LOL

[corvidology]

Have you seen the film version of True Grit? I don't normally recommend John Wayne(!) films but he's playing against type and the young lead is great!

[lunabee34]

No, I haven't! I avoided the films because I usually don't like Westerns (or John Wayne LOL), but everyone is recommending that film interestingly even more than the Cohen brothers one, so I'm guessing it's really good.

[author_by_night]

Glad you were pleasantly surprised by Portis!

I haven't read a lot of southern novels, but I've read a few. I definitely know what you mean about some versions of the southern US. I think nostalgia/apologia is a good way of putting it.

[lunabee34]

*nods nods*

The further back in time you go, the more likely you are to encounter that nostalgia/apologia. I thought before I started reading that Portis was writing earlier in the century which contributed to my misunderstanding that he would be that kind of writer. I'm glad I was wrong.