Entry tags:
You can't always get what you want. But if you try sometimes ...
Expect spammation this weekend. I am all by my lonesome and also ill and unlikely to go anywhere. Consider yourselves thusly warned. :)
So, I've been thinking about something for a little while now and then
thelastgoodname and I emailed about it and I decided to make a post because I find myself intensely curious about the way the rest of you approach this issue.
Until very recently, the fanfic I wrote fell into one of two categories. I either wrote stories that I thought other people would like to read (stories that the current trajectory of fandom is loving) or stories for which I received some bolt of lightning kind of inspiration (and these usually tend towards backstory or bits that canon has elided). By and large, the kinds of stories I usually write are not the kinds of stories I most like to read. In fact, I would often find myself thinking, "I'd really love to read X story. Why has no one written it?" while doing nothing about it.
It suddenly occurred to me that *I* could write the stories I wanted to read. Um, yes. Duh. Really, really duh. But for me not so much. It's taken me a while to get into the headspace where I can enjoy something I've written as much as something someone else has written, and even then I don't enjoy it in the same way. I still would prefer that someone else write that kickass Sheppard/Caldwell sex-slave AU because if I wrote it there would be no mystery for me there, no hanging on the edge of my seat wondering what was going to happen. There would be pleasure in the words and in the craft of it and in the figuring out the bones of the story, but it's not the same kind of pleasure as coming to a piece entirely from the outside (or as outside as you can be given the way that fandom has a tendecy to make us allrub off on influence each other LOL). Also for me is the issue that many of the stories I really, really want to read hit kinks (either sexual or narrative) that somehow feel strangely personal to write stories about. For example, I have no qualms telling you guys that I enjoy rape fic, but it somehow makes me feel vulnerable to contemplate writing it myself.
Even so, I've found myself writing fic in the past couple months that I wanted as a reader rather than a writer. So what about y'all? Thoughts? Examples?
So, I've been thinking about something for a little while now and then
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Until very recently, the fanfic I wrote fell into one of two categories. I either wrote stories that I thought other people would like to read (stories that the current trajectory of fandom is loving) or stories for which I received some bolt of lightning kind of inspiration (and these usually tend towards backstory or bits that canon has elided). By and large, the kinds of stories I usually write are not the kinds of stories I most like to read. In fact, I would often find myself thinking, "I'd really love to read X story. Why has no one written it?" while doing nothing about it.
It suddenly occurred to me that *I* could write the stories I wanted to read. Um, yes. Duh. Really, really duh. But for me not so much. It's taken me a while to get into the headspace where I can enjoy something I've written as much as something someone else has written, and even then I don't enjoy it in the same way. I still would prefer that someone else write that kickass Sheppard/Caldwell sex-slave AU because if I wrote it there would be no mystery for me there, no hanging on the edge of my seat wondering what was going to happen. There would be pleasure in the words and in the craft of it and in the figuring out the bones of the story, but it's not the same kind of pleasure as coming to a piece entirely from the outside (or as outside as you can be given the way that fandom has a tendecy to make us all
Even so, I've found myself writing fic in the past couple months that I wanted as a reader rather than a writer. So what about y'all? Thoughts? Examples?
no subject
If I have my characters do sexual things that I like, I feel sort of caddish because they tend to be things that I've actually done, and so I sort of feel What Happens in Vegas Stays in Vegas.
It's really common for me to have ideas for things that I couldn't possibly write--sort of like WordVids! I can't do it, but other people have the chops.
no subject
And I plan to watch much Homicide this weekend. Thursday was devoted to puking and watching SPN and today was devoted to puking and watching SGA and I think tomorrow will devoted to HLotS and not puking.
I also have ideas for things that I know I can't write. I just can't write long stuff. And I mostly like to read long stuff. So I'll have these ideas that really ought to be 20,000 words in execution and when I write them somehow get distilled down into a disappointing 2,500.
no subject
A big, sympathetic Ewwww! about the whole reverse peristalsis thing. HLOTS has some (but not a lot) of stuff that leads one's ginger ale and saltines to make a hasty exit, but I'm not sure about its ability to assist in keeping them DOWN.
And the deer is always tealer on the other side. I always keep thinking about which 2,500 of the 20,000 words are REALLY necessary.
no subject
Also, what is this teal deer thing? Years in fandom and I never heard anybody use that term and in the past three months it's everywhere.
no subject
"Teal deer" is the reverse-acronym for "tl; dr" (Too Long, Didn't Read). Which is my reason for not thinking of myself as a BtVS fan no matter how much I like the show.
no subject
LOL
no subject
no subject
And I agree with you that writing it is not the same as reading it. In addition to what you've mentioned here, I also like reading someone else's work better because one of the things I come to fanfic for is to be turned on and the act of writing tends to de-eroticize what I'm writing about. It becomes less about this hot experience I'm immersing myself in and more about me trying to get something right. Not very sexy when you're worried about the language of your sex scene. LOL
no subject
As for what I want to read, well, as I said, I tend to write the sort of thing I'd like to read and for the most part it doesn't tend to line up well with what the rest of fandom is writing.
no subject
I also am not a visual reader. I almost never have images in my mind when I read. Sometimes I do when I'm writing, but it's usually a single image that comes to me and the rest of the fic spirals out from there and I don't visualize the rest. In fact, sometimes when I'm writing a fight scene or something else complicated, I have to literally draw it out so I don't write something that's not possible. LOL
But I usually don't get turned on by anything I am writing, unless I've swallowed my fear and written one of my bulletproof kinks, and then it feels more like I'm transcribing a fantasy than actually writing.
no subject
Some stuff i really do want someone else to write because i'm *lazy*. Or because i know i'd go off on crazy tangents and it would be so fucking long and drawn out...when all i want is a pwp.
:)
no subject
That's often how my bolt of lightning inspiration takes shape. An image or a sentence or a little character insight that I suddenly notice that just begs for exploration.
And that doesn't sound bitchy at all. That's a perfectly valid reason to write something. And yay that you did cause yummy fic.
no subject
Although I'm really trying to wean myself out of it. Like, the other day when I thought, "Man, John McClane in panties would be so hot. Wish somebody would write that," rather than waiting around for something that was never gonna happen, I wrote it myself. And it was very satisfying. :)
no subject
I don't know what my deal is either because I have the same deal
not
I also don't know what your deal is.
Um. *flail*
:)
no subject
Yeah. Really, really yeah. There's a DWP story (unfinished but posted (http://telanu.thirteenblackbirds.net/thexingredient.htm)) that I would have loved to write -- that I would love to write my own version of -- but because I like it so much, because it does all the things I want to read about, I can't write it.
Maybe it's also the fantasizing versus writing aspect of things; some things (like the sex stories that I want to read) are better left to other activities, a running storyline in my head at opportune moments, rather than written down and shared with the world. (Or maybe for those types of stories, I get too distracted when writing them.)
My other problem -- and this shows up in the narrative kinks I like, too -- is that they all tend to soapish melodrama in my head, but the stories I write are all restrained and realistic.
The stories where someone gets amnesia or has some sort of compulsion to act or restriction on acting, and there's a relationship of convenience ("you should move in with me because you've forgotten everything but I only have one bed"), and there's unrequited love except without the plot contrivances it would be requited, and then there's a happy ending after all -- those stories are the ones I love to read, but I would feel terribly embarrassed to write them because, well, too much information.
On the other hand, people usually assume that everything you write has some ring of truth to it, even when it doesn't (the "if you've written about molestation or rape, you must have been raped or molested yourself" phenomenon at work). So mostly you can't win.
But then you can't get the stories you want to read. But maybe I will write them. Someday. In the future. When I can wrap my head around wanting Andy Sachs to get amnesia and have to move in to Miranda's house and share Miranda's bedroom for reasons that are completely unclear to me, and then there is sex. The end.
(Now that I've just typed that, I see what the problem is: "reasons that are completely unclear to me." I can buy a lot of things that ordinarily wouldn't make any sense when reading. When I'm writing, it has to be perfectly clear and sensible in my head; I can't handwave anything when I'm writing, and the stories I really like to read often involve some level of handwavines.)
no subject
And then I realize that one of the reasons I don't write those stories is because I have this standard of what makes good writing that suddenly seems patently ridiculous.
Am I making any sense here? I feel like I'm sort of flapping my arms about and spewing nonsense. LOL
no subject
But when you say, "makes people feel," which feelings are we talking about? Because the kind of satisfaction that comes from melodrama is different from the kind that comes from "literature," right? I mean, we've both read very good things that escaped the melodrama curse even though they probably should have succumbed (The Lovely Bones comes to mind). Of course, I'm not sure how you would hit the stuck-together-sharing-a-sleeping-bad-and-then-sudden-sex plot and still be beautifully written with elegant metaphors, but surely someone can do it. Just not me.
no subject
no subject
For me, I usually do get more pleasure out of reading the fanfic than the other.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I gave a paper at a conference last weekend and my paper was about a Victorian writer named Ouida. She was hugely important and famous and influential in her day but she's pretty much fallen off the radar at this point. Someone asked me whether I think Ouida's work is interesting in terms of what it has to say about the culture and the time period or whether I think it has genuine literary merit. And the question made me stop and think and realize that I didn't know how to answer it. Because elegant metaphors, not so much. But yes with the fun and the funny and the tears and suspense.
I'm not sure that the satisfaction I get from high literature and other kinds of reading *is* different because I tend to not separate them in my mind. (Which, of course, begs the question of why I do so with fanfic if I don't with published works) Stephen King alongside Dickens.
I guess it really all boils down to what I think I'm trying to do when I write fanfic. Impress/intellectually engage or stimulate the emotions. And suddenly, I'm kinda not sure anymore. As you say, both would be super awesome.
no subject
I've just realized that I have very different headspaces for reading and writing. Maybe the intent -- what I'm trying to do -- is different, too: I read to entertain myself. Do I write to entertain other people? Or to make a point? Or something else entirely?
Also, what does "genuine literary merit" mean? I mean, John Grisham and Danielle Steele have some sort of merit, and so do Dickens or Shakespeare -- and it's the exact same merit, right? Culturally, at least, at the time of their writing. Shakespeare and Dickens have just lasted longer, but maybe that's only because Grisham or Steele haven't had the opportunity to last through generations.
no subject
And I have no idea what genuine literary merit means. I really don't. I feel vaguely blasphemous saying this, but it's like porn. I know it when I see it. Or something. I mean, I will argue that The Stand has literary merit but not so much The Bodyguard's Assignment which is the most formulaic and crappy romance novel I have perhaps ever read. But that's not because I think romance novels have no literary merit--hello, Sweet, Savage Love--but because that particular novel is freaking awful.
no subject
Ooh, ooh, I've written that. Only there are two beds. This does not last.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
The word is being spread, though--I don't have HBO, so I haven't watched The Wire in broadcast.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject