![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Josh is getting a vasectomy tomorrow, and he's nervous about it. I completely understand his anxiety, but I think he'll be okay. The one thing I was worried about was blood clots given his history, but the doctor assured us that this surgery poses almost no risk of blood clots and he's never seen anyone develop a blood clot due to a vasectomy in his decades of doing the surgery. Whew.
We'd been talking about Josh getting one since Fi was born, and a couple weeks ago out of the blue, he told me he'd made an appointment to get one.
We had to go to the consultation together because, get this, they refuse to do vasectomies unless wives sign a waiver saying it's okay. I mean, clearly they do this to avoid litigation; they (or at least the industry in general) have probably been sued before by wives who say their husbands have secretly obtained vasectomies when the wives wanted more children. But, man, this rubbed me the wrong way. He should have complete autonomy over his body. Wow.
I was also nonplussed that they didn't formally schedule the surgery until today. Fortunately they scheduled it at a time that was convenient for us, but we have no family here. If they'd given him the 5:30 slot they told him yesterday was an option, how would we have gotten Fi and Ems to school? Zero amount of time to plan.
Anyway, wish his crotch well, y'all. :)
We'd been talking about Josh getting one since Fi was born, and a couple weeks ago out of the blue, he told me he'd made an appointment to get one.
We had to go to the consultation together because, get this, they refuse to do vasectomies unless wives sign a waiver saying it's okay. I mean, clearly they do this to avoid litigation; they (or at least the industry in general) have probably been sued before by wives who say their husbands have secretly obtained vasectomies when the wives wanted more children. But, man, this rubbed me the wrong way. He should have complete autonomy over his body. Wow.
I was also nonplussed that they didn't formally schedule the surgery until today. Fortunately they scheduled it at a time that was convenient for us, but we have no family here. If they'd given him the 5:30 slot they told him yesterday was an option, how would we have gotten Fi and Ems to school? Zero amount of time to plan.
Anyway, wish his crotch well, y'all. :)
no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 02:26 am (UTC)We had to go to the consultation together because, get this, they refuse to do vasectomies unless wives sign a waiver saying it's okay.
Wow, total opposite of "our" experience. And I say "our" in scare quotes because
[
Surgeon: So, you married?
Surgeon: Got any kids?
Surgeon: Does your wife know you're here?
no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 05:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 06:03 am (UTC)I've heard from quite a few guys who had to get "consent from the wife" - only one said she had to sign anything, the others just had to be at the doctor's. It seems to be fairly common on this side of the pond.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 04:12 pm (UTC)getting thrir tubes tied/ what does their partner think etc. At least the idiocy goes both ways?)
no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 11:52 pm (UTC)But it really shocked me even though it shouldn't have given the idiocy you mention re: women and their tubes.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 06:42 pm (UTC)Weird that you had to consent. At least it goes both ways wrt women and men, but still, odd. They gave my sister a hard time about wanting her tubes tied after she had Ireland AND A HEART ATTACK because of her age. *smh*
(Using the squirrel icon for my last comment, not my wishes for Josh and his crotch. *g*)
no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 11:55 pm (UTC)I cannot tell you how angry it makes me that women get hassled about getting their tubes tied from largely male doctors. It's a quality of life issue and, you know, if somebody gets hysterectomy or tubal ligation and ten years later, they decide they want a kid, they can adopt one! I'm sorry your sister had to go through that. *hugs*
no subject
Date: 2015-09-19 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 10:11 pm (UTC)was that a 5:30 a.m. possibility?
the best of luck to him & his crotch.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-18 11:56 pm (UTC)Fortunately, they called him yesterday and gave us an 830 slot. So we could drop off the kids at the regular time and then head out to Macon.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-21 04:18 am (UTC)R had one in 2006 and we had an absurd experience - we explained our reasons to the doctor (he'd never wanted kids, and the severity of my health issues meant it wouldn't be wise to go through pregnancy/childbirth/child-rearing) and had a damned hard time convincing him! He claimed to have a 'special interest' in my condition and to know my specialist, and said that I shouldn't have any more problems than other women, which ROTFL NO. What finally convinced him was me saying that R's family are all abroad and I can only rely on my ageing mother, so we'd have no support with a child. I realise that at 24 I was young to be okaying my life partner's decision (as if he should need my okay in the first place), but it all felt very rooted in local culture and traditionalism and patriarchy....
no subject
Date: 2015-09-24 01:12 am (UTC)Oh my gosh, that is absurd. :( I genuinely do not understand what doctors are thinking sometimes. I get that some of it is motivated by wanting to avoid lawsuits, but the ones who seem to just genuinely believe that people in their twenties can't make these kinds of decisions are so obnoxious.