Avenue of Mysteries by John Irving
Apr. 5th, 2016 07:42 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, we had a colleague over for dinner in December and spent a wonderful evening talking about favorite books and favorite authors. Jon's favorite author is John Irving; I read The World According to Garp about 15 years ago and remember enjoying it (although I don't think I'd be able to read it now because of child death as a prominent plot point) but remember little else about the book or Irving's writing style.
We don't normally exchange Christmas gifts with Jon, but he surprised me with Irving's latest book, and now that I have read it, I have to come up with good things to say about it as the gift was very thoughtful and kind.
So, the good stuff first.
The book is called Avenue of Mysteries because it deals with the capital M Mysteries of the Catholic Church, but also because it is in some sense a mystery story. The past is interwoven deftly with the present in such a way that clues about how the protagonist's life is shaped gradually come together, and figuring out what happened to Juan Diego when he was a kid and what's happening to him now at the end of his life is really interesting.
Irving is good at characterization. Lupe, Juan Diego's sister, is fascinating, as are any number of the characters in the book.
Juan Diego's adopted parents die of AIDS in the early nineties, and reading about how much he loved them and how he was never ashamed or embarrassed by their unorthodox relationship is incredibly moving. In fact, Juan Diego explicitly states that one of the reasons he never pursues a romantic relationship with anyone is that he can't imagine loving anyone as much as his parents loved each other.
However, I feel as if this is a book that only a white guy of a certain age could love (which will not feature in my discussion of this book with Jon as he is indeed a white guy of a certain age).
Lots and lots and lots of unnecessary sex with women much younger than Juan Diego (two women, in fact; a mother and daughter who I am pretty sure are supposed to be avatars of the Virgin Mary and the Virgin of Guadalupe). Lots and lots of thinking about sex and phallic imagery. I was infinitely more interested in the story of Juan Diego's childhood, so the constant cutting back to the present where he debates whether to take Viagra or skip his beta blockers and has moderately embarrassing (to me!) sex with goddess/deities was Not the Thing for Me.
I also was confused about a plot point. One of Juan Diego's adopted parents is Flor, a prostitute. Flor is always referred to with feminine pronouns, Flor identifies as a woman, and Flor takes female hormones (and there's a really poignant section where she has to stop taking them because they interfere with her AIDS treatment and Juan Diego shaves her beard every day for her; I totally am tearing up right now just thinking about it). Yet Irving consistently calls Flor a transvestite. I fully admit my ignorance, but wouldn't that make Flor transgender? I always thought transvestites are men who identify as men but enjoy wearing women's clothes. Maybe Irving was trying to use the language that would have been in place in Juan Diego's childhood, but then I think he would have been sure to use 21st century terms in the present day narrative to contrast the terms. IDK
So, not my favorite, but I did cry a couple three times, so that's a point in Irving's favor.
We don't normally exchange Christmas gifts with Jon, but he surprised me with Irving's latest book, and now that I have read it, I have to come up with good things to say about it as the gift was very thoughtful and kind.
So, the good stuff first.
The book is called Avenue of Mysteries because it deals with the capital M Mysteries of the Catholic Church, but also because it is in some sense a mystery story. The past is interwoven deftly with the present in such a way that clues about how the protagonist's life is shaped gradually come together, and figuring out what happened to Juan Diego when he was a kid and what's happening to him now at the end of his life is really interesting.
Irving is good at characterization. Lupe, Juan Diego's sister, is fascinating, as are any number of the characters in the book.
Juan Diego's adopted parents die of AIDS in the early nineties, and reading about how much he loved them and how he was never ashamed or embarrassed by their unorthodox relationship is incredibly moving. In fact, Juan Diego explicitly states that one of the reasons he never pursues a romantic relationship with anyone is that he can't imagine loving anyone as much as his parents loved each other.
However, I feel as if this is a book that only a white guy of a certain age could love (which will not feature in my discussion of this book with Jon as he is indeed a white guy of a certain age).
Lots and lots and lots of unnecessary sex with women much younger than Juan Diego (two women, in fact; a mother and daughter who I am pretty sure are supposed to be avatars of the Virgin Mary and the Virgin of Guadalupe). Lots and lots of thinking about sex and phallic imagery. I was infinitely more interested in the story of Juan Diego's childhood, so the constant cutting back to the present where he debates whether to take Viagra or skip his beta blockers and has moderately embarrassing (to me!) sex with goddess/deities was Not the Thing for Me.
I also was confused about a plot point. One of Juan Diego's adopted parents is Flor, a prostitute. Flor is always referred to with feminine pronouns, Flor identifies as a woman, and Flor takes female hormones (and there's a really poignant section where she has to stop taking them because they interfere with her AIDS treatment and Juan Diego shaves her beard every day for her; I totally am tearing up right now just thinking about it). Yet Irving consistently calls Flor a transvestite. I fully admit my ignorance, but wouldn't that make Flor transgender? I always thought transvestites are men who identify as men but enjoy wearing women's clothes. Maybe Irving was trying to use the language that would have been in place in Juan Diego's childhood, but then I think he would have been sure to use 21st century terms in the present day narrative to contrast the terms. IDK
So, not my favorite, but I did cry a couple three times, so that's a point in Irving's favor.
no subject
Date: 2016-04-06 12:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-04-06 01:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-04-06 01:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-04-06 06:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-04-09 01:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
From: