1. We weathered the storm with zero property damage. Lots of limbs down and a tree fell in the wooded area (nowhere near the house). We've done several hours of yard clean-up with many more to go but so grateful.
We were without power from midnight Thursday night to midnight last night. It stayed cool in the house all day and was pretty much the best experience without power I've ever had.
2. Josh's endoscopy went off without a hitch this morning. Nothing immediately visibly wrong; we'll see at follow up in a few weeks if anything was actually discovered. I suspect no, but *shrugs*.
3.
Writing Without Teachers by
Peter ElbowMy rating:
4 of 5 starsI first read this book in 2001 as a newly minted graduate student. It's hard to overstate Peter Elbow's influence on the academy; if you teach writing, you probably use at least some of the strategies he talks about in this book (whether that's writing with your students, freewriting, metacognition about the writing process, peer review, etc). What made this re-read especially fun is my almost twenty year old marginalia; on this re-read, I'm picking up some things that I missed as a newbie scholar, but on the whole, I have to say that my feelings about this book haven't changed much since I initially read it, and for the parts I am most resistant to, that resistance feels even stronger now than when I could barely call myself an academic.
Most of what Elbow has to say I am completely on board with. But he's extremely skeptical and hostile toward teachers (in general but of writing in particular); over and over again, he accuses teachers of conflating themselves with God and of teaching in certain ways because they are easiest (as if teachers are inherently lazy) and of being disingenuous. I think some of this antipathy is probably coming out the political/social climate at the time, but I think his valuations of what teachers of writing are doing in general are unnecessarily harsh and unfair, especially since the kind of teaching he's advocating for is extremely time-consuming and not quantifiable in the way that SACS and other accrediting boards would like for the work of college students to be; criticizing teaching without acknowledging the parameters within which teachers have to work is irritating to me as a reader.
I was also shocked once again when I got to his appendix essay. He spends some time talking about the academy as more tolerant of male voices and male scholarly styles while suggesting that female voices and scholarly approaches are valuable; Elbow follows that up with using a rape metaphor and a woman of loose morals metaphor a few pages later. 21 year old me circled that hot mess and wrote, "so this is the non-sexist language the believing game will use." 39 year old me would have led off with WTF, but I do not believe that term was in common parlance at the time.
So, if you teach writing, I highly recommend this book. Lots of useful stuff here to mine, but the occasional WTF moment rears its head throughout.
View all my reviews4.
Gemini Bites by
Patrick RyanMy rating:
4 of 5 starsThis is a really fun read. Kaleecat gave me the uncorrected proof of this book to read, so there might be some small discrepancies between the copy I read and the final version.
First, this is really funny. Excellent narrative voice. Really nicely drawn characters.
It's a quick and easy read, but I think it will appeal to readers of all ages, not just teens.
It alternates between POV chapters from Kyle and his twin Judy. Kyle is struggling with being gay without a gay community; Judy is struggling with trying to find a boyfriend and lands on a scheme of pretending to be a born-again Christian in order to do so. They both are fascinated with Garret, their new house guest who might be a vampire. And he seems fascinated with them both.
I think most of you would enjoy this.
View all my reviews